Business

Hergott: Portable electronic device ban welcomed

The National Traffic Safety Board in the United States issued a press release Dec. 13, 2011, calling for an outright ban on the use of portable electronic devices by drivers.

Not just a ban on handheld devices, but an outright ban on the use of all portable electronic devices—even hands-free.

The call for an outright ban arose from yet another series of deaths and injuries arising from drivers distracted by cell phones.

The chairperson of the National Traffic Safety Board said: “The data is clear; the time to act is now. How many more lives will be lost before we, as a society, change our attitudes about the deadliness of distractions?”

In British Columbia, hand held cell phone use was banned in January 2010.

In my Jan. 24, 2010, column, I quoted from a summary of research findings from the motor vehicle branch in this province: “Evidence also concludes that there is no difference between the level of driver distraction associated with hands-free and hand-held cell phone use.”

I posed the rhetorical question of when will we take the other step forward and prohibit wireless chatting while driving altogether.

It’s not having only one hand on the steering wheel that causes crashes. It’s being distracted by the conversation. Interestingly, studies have shown that conversations between driver and passenger are not as distracting.

Banning hand-helds did nothing for us except stimulate the cell phone industry.

I wonder how many millions of dollars have been wasted on cell phone peripherals as a result of the hand-held ban.

Aside from the horrendous cost to British Columbians, I would argue that instead of making our roads safer, banning hand-helds actually made our roads less safe.

Before, concerned British Columbians would have limited or completely avoided their cell phone use, conscious of the dangers of distraction. The truly safety conscious drove with their cell phone in the trunk.

With the hand-held ban, British Columbians were sent the message that hands-free cellphone use was safe, that the problem was with the hand-held, not with the conversation.

Cell phone use by drivers has more likely increased, rather than decreased.

We have seen what effective legislation can do to stop crashes and save lives.

The new impaired driving legislation in B.C. has been brilliantly effective.

Have you seen the statistics? There has been an astoundingly beautiful reduction in alcohol related crashes. Yes, there is more work to be done, but it is a fabulous start. Let’s heed the results of the research done by our own superintendent of motor vehicles. Let’s notice the calls to action in other parts of the world.

Let’s reduce crashes and save lives with another bold legislative move and ban the use of all portable electronic devices by drivers.

Until the political will builds to the point that effective legislation is finally passed, how about be proactive. Use this time of resolutions to resolve to pop your cell phone into the trunk in 2012.

One crash is too many.

Paul Hergott is a lawyer  at Hergott Law in West Kelowna.

 

paul@hlaw.ca

 

 

We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

You might like ...

Jon Stewart, Obama, Elizabeth Warren sound off on American government shutdown
 
Davis: Pain & Gain based on true crime
 
COLUMN: Twin Peaks’ Kootenay/Boundary connections
Date set for murder trial of Terrace girl in Kamloops
 
Explore patterns in saving energy in Nelson
 
Hugs beat up slugs

Community Events, October 2014

Add an Event

Read the latest eEdition

Browse the print edition page by page, including stories and ads.

Oct 17 edition online now. Browse the archives.