Business

Hergott: Pursuing injury claim lawsuits has an element of risk

In my Sept. 15, 2011, column, “Only Winners are the Lawyers in Insurance Claim Lawsuits,” I promised to answer the question of why contingency fees charged by personal injury lawyers are so high.

Percentages range, but one-third is typical. On the face of it, that sounds insane.

As a comparison, you certainly wouldn’t pay a real estate agent a one-third sales commission on the sale of your house.

With a house, though, you can pay $500 for an appraisal and know the value up front.

Reasonably priced, and listed according to standard marketing protocols, your house is going to sell close to appraised value.

Also, the amount of work the real estate agent is going to put into selling your house is reasonably predictable.

Personal injury claims are very different. A personal injury claim cannot be appraised.

There is no way to reliably predict how significant your harms and losses will be at the time you are hiring a lawyer.

Since your claim is for fair financial compensation for those harms and losses, there is accordingly no way to reliably predict the size of your claim.

The only “appraisal” of injury is a doctor’s prognosis.

In the early stages a medical prognosis is about as reliable as a weather forecast.

Even if there was a crystal ball that could accurately predict the course of your recovery and whether or not that recovery will be a full one, the real question is how your injuries will impact on your life.

Two people suffering exactly the same injury, with exactly the same pattern of recovery, will likely have very different harms and losses.

One, working in a desk job, might not require any time off work. Another, a massage therapist, might never be able to return to full time work.

It is typically past the two year deadline for commencing a lawsuit to enforce your claim when your harms and losses into the future can be reliably predicted.

To illustrate this point, fair compensation for harms and losses suffered by one of my clients injured in a rear-ender crash was less than $20,000.

At the other end of the spectrum, fair compensation in another rear-ender crash claim was over $800,000.

Both of them had suffered whiplash injuries and each of them had an initially optimistic medical prognosis.

By the way, before you start hoping that the three cherries come up on the slot machine for you, consider that the $800,000 was compensation for a fellow with such serious, unrelenting pain that he is unlikely to ever work again.

In addition to a completely unpredictable claim size, there is no way to predict how much work the lawyer will have to do to achieve fair compensation.

If a lawyer billed his or her time hourly, a lawyer might spend as little as $10,000 worth of time on a case.

At the other end of the spectrum, a lawyer might spend as much as $100,000 of time, or more.

The amount of time spent working on a case is not related to the size of the claim.

Some of my hardest fought battles are over relatively small claims.

When I first started handling personal injury cases, approximately 15 years ago, I always offered potential clients a choice of paying me by the hour for the time I spent instead of paying me a percentage fee.

I stopped offering the choice because I found I was wasting my breath; nobody  was interested in the hourly rate option.

Nobody wanted the hourly rate choice because they didn’t want to take the risk that my hourly rate fees would exceed the percentage, or even exceed the total value of the claim.

They wanted me to take the risk instead.

That is what you are paying for when you agree up front to pay one-third of your claim to a lawyer—you are paying to eliminate that risk.

You are also eliminating the risk that, where liability is not crystal clear, your case is dismissed and there is no compensation paid at all for your harms and losses.

In that circumstance, the lawyer is paid no fees at all.

Of course, if you could rely on the insurance company to pony up fair compensation for your harms and losses without having to hire a lawyer, I would be out of a job.

In fact, fair compensation achieved with the assistance of a lawyer is typically several times what an insurance adjuster will offer an injury victim who’s not represented by a lawyer.

This column is intended to provide general information about injury claims.  It is not a substitute for retaining a lawyer to provide legal advice specifically pertaining to your case. Paul Hergott is a lawyer  at Hergott Law in West Kelowna.

paul@hlaw.ca

 

 

We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

You might like ...

#UsedHelps: Connecting Business with Canadian Charities
 
B.C. oil refinery backers move ahead
 
RCMP seeks public help in solving arson
Just the Facts: Medical Marijuana in Canada (VIDEO)
 
BC Ferries ends fuel surcharge as oil falls
 
Take a holiday light tour of Langley
Cheesy restaurant is all about comfort food
 
Avoiding post-holiday debt blues
 
Port truckers angry with rates eye new strike

Community Events, December 2014

Add an Event


Read the latest eEdition

Browse the print edition page by page, including stories and ads.

Dec 19 edition online now. Browse the archives.