- BC Games
Hergott: Trinity Western law school bid conflicting for lawyers
There is a lively debate going on among British Columbia lawyers right now that has to do with a competition between freedom of religion and the right to be free from discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation.
Trinity Western University is a long established university, with a campus in Langley. The school plans to offer a law degree program starting in September 2016.
TWU is a Christian school. Its mission statement reads: “As an arm of the Church, to develop godly Christian leaders: positive, goal oriented university graduates with thoroughly Christian minds; growing disciples of Christ who glorify God through fulfilling the Great Commission, serving God and people in the various marketplaces of life.”
While Christianity has come a long way, with discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation having been eliminated from many Christian faiths, not so with TWU.
The school requires students and faculty to enter into a covenant that is discriminatory against those in same sex relationships.
This discriminatory covenant is giving the lawyers of British Columbia pause for thought.
Lawyers make up the Law Society of British Columbia. The LSBC gets to decide whether or not a law school will be approved as providing a legal education that will be recognized so as to allow its graduates to become lawyers. If the LSBC gives the TWU law school a “thumbs down,” its graduates will not be able to practice law in this province.
On April 11, 2014, our lawyer representatives of the law society (called “benchers”) voted to give the TWU law school a “thumbs up.”
There has been what you might call an uprising among the masses to call a special general meeting to allow a vote of all British Columbia lawyers on that issue.
Provided enough signatures are collected to trigger the special general meeting, we will be able to have a full debate and then learn the views of the majority of the more than 11,000 lawyers in British Columbia.
Should the majority of this province’s lawyers be able to dictate the religious beliefs of a Christian minority?
Absolutely not. Lawyers swear an oath that includes the solemn commitment that we “…will uphold the rule of law and the rights and freedoms of all persons according to the laws of Canada and of the Province of British Columbia.” The rights and freedoms we have sworn to uphold include the freedom of religion, expression, assembly and association enshrined in section 2 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.”
Nothing the LSBC decides can impact on what is preached in churches and taught in private educational institutions.
The issue is whether or not a legal education obtained in an openly discriminatory educational environment should be approved as qualifying a graduating law student to practice law.
Will graduates of a program that openly discriminates on the basis of sexual orientation be suited to uphold the same oath that requires us lawyers to protect against such discrimination?
The concern, as expressed by Jeremy Webber, the dean of law at the University of Victoria, is whether “…a program that bars validly married gay and lesbian people from its classes simply because of their sexual orientation is an appropriate context in which to learn to be a lawyer.”
Mr. Webber points out an analogy to racial discrimination, noting that “if the admissions policy of a proposed law school discriminated on the basis of race—even if that discrimination was based on religious belief—no law society in the country would accredit it.”
Our society has evolved, finally, such that racial discrimination is repugnant to most of us.
But our evolution with regard to discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation has not yet caught up.
I encourage you to push the lawyers you deal with to support the triggering of a special general meeting so the TWU law school application issue can be addressed by a fully informed majority of B.C. lawyers.