Letters to the Editor

Accountant’s PST example all wrong, 2

To the editor:

While I don’t want to wade into the HST issue, I must point out the error of the example Gabriele Banka used in here June 28 column on the HST.

The example is the process (and taxes accrued) on the trip of a log in the woods to a finished desk.

Rather than PST being charged on first the log, then again on the sawn wood and yet a third time on the manufactured desk; what would actually happen is the sawmill would buy the log PST-exempt from the logger as a raw material and in turn the desk manufacturer would buy the sawn wood PST-exempt from the sawmill as a raw material.

Only when the desk was sold to the end user would PST be payable.

Vern Klukas,

Kelowna

 

We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

You might like ...

Medal haul for OKM swim team
 
Nyhus thrives on European volleyball experience
 
Telemark hosts Teck B.C. Cup this weekend
Rebels earn weekend split
 
Knights of Columbus host curling event
 
Free skating proves a big hit at the Castlegar Complex
Ghostriders take on the Creston Valley Thundercats on Friday Oct 11
 
Scott Thursday Night Race Series overall results
 
Rock and Roll-er derby

Community Events, November 2014

Add an Event


Read the latest eEdition

Browse the print edition page by page, including stories and ads.

Nov 21 edition online now. Browse the archives.