Letters to the Editor

Negative option approval process flawed

To the editor:

Regarding Jennifer Smith’s article Dec. 12, City Decides to Sell Naming Rights for New Pool:

You mention that 4,521 people registered their opposition to the (Mission aquatic centre) project. But the alternative approval process was flawed.

Using rough numbers: there are 100,000 inhabitants in Kelowna; there are 80,000 registered voters and they were the only ones allowed to vote. Further, if you did not get to City Hall to cast your negative vote (for any reason), you were deemed to have made a positive vote—a really fair way to handle the “approval” process.

After the negative votes were counted, the mayor said that she had not been in favour of the process, but must have approved it in order for it to take place. Let us not forget the facts.

Geoff Walsh,


We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

You might like ...

Austin endorses Cullen
Resource issues dominate Terrace all candidates meeting
VIDEO: Witnesses describe scene at Parliament Hill; Raw footage of Ottawa shootings
Heart of Our City: Jasper Nolos gets reacquainted with home
Security stepped up in B.C. after attacks in Ottawa
John York running for Cranbrook mayor
Refugee living the Canadian dream
High demand for Oliver jail-jobs seminars
Diverse group of panelists discuss potential pros and cons of LNG in Prince Rupert

Community Events, October 2014

Add an Event

Read the latest eEdition

Browse the print edition page by page, including stories and ads.

Oct 24 edition online now. Browse the archives.