Letters to the Editor

Negative option no way to conduct a democratic process

To the editor:

I concur with Geoff Walsh’s assessment of the alternative approval system (Negative Option Approval Process Flawed, Dec. 19 Capital News). It is flawed and less than democratic, given that only 31.4 per cent of voters cast ballets in the last municipal election but 10 per cent of all eligible voters are required to trigger a referendum.

Three of the new approvals carry a cost of almost $58 million. As a comparison the Aquatic Center at some $44 million was itself expected to raise the average tax bill by 2.8 per cent (Dec. 12, Capital News). Anyone concerned with rising tax rates should sign the three response forms and send council a strong message that if they want the taxpayer’s approval, they should use the normal voting procedure, not a negative one.

January 10 at 4 p.m. is the last date to submit signed forms to City Hall.

Allan Farrar,


We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

Community Events, February 2017

Add an Event