Letters to the Editor

Negative option no way to conduct a democratic process

To the editor:

I concur with Geoff Walsh’s assessment of the alternative approval system (Negative Option Approval Process Flawed, Dec. 19 Capital News). It is flawed and less than democratic, given that only 31.4 per cent of voters cast ballets in the last municipal election but 10 per cent of all eligible voters are required to trigger a referendum.

Three of the new approvals carry a cost of almost $58 million. As a comparison the Aquatic Center at some $44 million was itself expected to raise the average tax bill by 2.8 per cent (Dec. 12, Capital News). Anyone concerned with rising tax rates should sign the three response forms and send council a strong message that if they want the taxpayer’s approval, they should use the normal voting procedure, not a negative one.

January 10 at 4 p.m. is the last date to submit signed forms to City Hall.

Allan Farrar,


We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

You might like ...

DeHart: New retail pharmacy all about living healthy lifestyle
Kelowna Chiefs duo to play at Central Oklahoma
Double gold for Dr. Knox Falcons
Scott settles for 3rd at B.C. Scotties
World Cup of Hockey returns in 2016
Deep field of teams for Western Canada tourney
Falcons to be well-travelled in 2015
UBCO Master of Science in Nursing program revised
Women well represented as Liberal candidates in upcoming federal election in the Okanagan

Community Events, January 2015

Add an Event

Read the latest eEdition

Browse the print edition page by page, including stories and ads.

Jan 23 edition online now. Browse the archives.