Letters to the Editor

Negative option no way to conduct a democratic process

To the editor:

I concur with Geoff Walsh’s assessment of the alternative approval system (Negative Option Approval Process Flawed, Dec. 19 Capital News). It is flawed and less than democratic, given that only 31.4 per cent of voters cast ballets in the last municipal election but 10 per cent of all eligible voters are required to trigger a referendum.

Three of the new approvals carry a cost of almost $58 million. As a comparison the Aquatic Center at some $44 million was itself expected to raise the average tax bill by 2.8 per cent (Dec. 12, Capital News). Anyone concerned with rising tax rates should sign the three response forms and send council a strong message that if they want the taxpayer’s approval, they should use the normal voting procedure, not a negative one.

January 10 at 4 p.m. is the last date to submit signed forms to City Hall.

Allan Farrar,


We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

You might like ...

Municipalities to stay the course on CN Rail corridor, despite First Nations opposition
Woman rushed to hospital after train and car collision
Suspicious activity reported at Safeway
Cooke siblings travelling to Europe to compete in Freeride World Tour
Easy win for hugs
OPINION: Hugs win again
MP REPORT: New regulations and legislation introduced
KIJHL: Raucous rivalry renewed
#UsedHelps: Connecting Business with Canadian Charities

Community Events, December 2014

Add an Event

Read the latest eEdition

Browse the print edition page by page, including stories and ads.

Dec 17 edition online now. Browse the archives.