Hergott: Valid insurance claims often are initially rejected

On the one hand, it is such complicated stuff that even judges can get it wrong.

On the one hand, it is such complicated stuff that even judges can get it wrong.

On the other hand, it is about as simple a concept as could be imagined.

Let’s say that you already have a bad back before being the innocent victim of a crash.

Earlier in your life you had suffered a back injury that resulted in pain so bad you couldn’t work.

That disabling pain has since settled down, but it didn’t go away completely. It was manageable with over-the-counter medication.

You were able to return to work, and to do so full-time for the better part of a decade leading up to the crash.

That previous back injury had taken a toll on your spine. An x-ray taken before the crash shows all sorts of wear and tear that the medical community calls “degeneration.”

The rear-ender crash that the insurance company calls “low velocity” was enough to trigger a return of the serious pain and disables you from work.

This time, the pain does not settle down. This time, you are left with permanent, disabling pain.

So you make a claim for fair compensation for your injuries. The insurance company representing the rear-ending driver sends you to a specialist.

The specialist says that while there was injury caused by the crash, that injury should have resolved quickly. Your ongoing, disabling pain is a direct result of the degeneration.

Does that mean that the insurance company can deny your claim?

Well, of course the insurance company can, and will, deny your claim. I expect that many who are reading this column can vouch personally for how the insurance company handles this type of situation.

The thing is that an insurance company’s denial of your claim doesn’t mean that your claim is invalid.

Insurance companies deny valid claims all the time. It makes good business sense to deny claims.

Many, if not most, injured victims with valid claims won’t know any better and will go away.

If it wasn’t for the crash, your back symptoms would have remained manageable. But for the crash triggering a return of your disabling back pain, you would have continued on just fine with only over the counter medication.

On the other hand, if you had not suffered that previous back injury and had not been left with all that degeneration in your spine, the injury from the crash would have resolved completely.

The law is crystal clear on this point.  A negligent driver (and by extension the driver’s insurance company) must compensate an innocent victim for all losses that would have been avoided had the crash been avoided.

It is no defence to say that you were more susceptible to suffering those losses than another, healthier victim, who did not already have a bad back.

That’s fair, right? It’s not your fault you were in the crash.

What if, though, that bad back was bound to get worse at some point? Perhaps it would have held out for another 10 years, and then the disabling pain was bound to return.

As you might expect, you are entitled to compensation for those 10 years when you would have continued to enjoy manageable back pain.

You are not entitled to compensation for the disabling pain that would have come on, regardless of the crash, 10 years in the future.

A very recent discussion of these legal principles is contained within the August 2, 2011, decision of our Court of Appeal in Farrant v. Laktin. If you have difficulty finding that case on the British Columbia Supreme Court web site, e-mail me and I will send you a link.

And, if you are one of the many who have been screwed by an unfair insurance company denial of your claim, please spread the word to avoid others having to suffer the same fate.

This column is intended to provide general information about injury claims.  It is not a substitute for retaining a lawyer to provide legal advice specifically pertaining to your case.

Paul Hergott is a lawyer at Hergott Law in West Kelowna.




Just Posted

Okanagan can learn from Washington’s wine industry growth

Winery owner cites importance of industry collaboration

Okanagan wineries shine in global chardonnay competition

Recognition for Kalala and Liquidity wineries at 2018 Chardonnay du Monde competition

Kelowna’s South Perimeter Road project to go ahead

Project to extend Gordon Drive doesn’t get enough signatures to keep it from moving ahead

Fleeing driver leaves behind severely damaged car

West Kelowna crash occurred at Highway 97 South junction

Dozens of impaired Kelowna drivers ticketed on St. Patrick’s Day

Kelowna RCMP stopped many vehicles for impaired driving during a one day blitz

Rainy week ahead for Okanagan and Shuswap

Environment Canada is forecast rain for the next three days, starting Tuesday afternoon

Attempted gun smuggler across the Osoyoos border sentenced

Alex Louie, who prefers the name Senk’lip, was sentenced to the mandatory minimum

Pro-Trump protest sign with F-word is OK, court rules

Judges say Ontario man can protest publicly, even using vulgar language

VIDEO: Police officer looking for distracted drivers gets hit by truck

Road safety investigator clipped by trailer while patrolling busy intersection

YVR wants you to help name three new puppies

Say hello to the Vancouver Airport’s new assistance pups

Search and rescue help injured sledders off Owlhead

Volunteer searchers also locate two hikers near Little Shuswap Lake

Suspect who attacked autistic man in Ontario could be from B.C.’s south coast: police

29-year-old man was sent to hospital with serious injuries

Privacy watchdog to explore Facebook leak

Canadian expert says his analytics company helped Trump campaign capitalize on private Facebook info

How to keep local news visible in your Facebook feed

Facebook has changed the news feed to emphasize personal connections. You might see less news.

Most Read