Smithson: Retirement: Aging Air Canada pilots still grounded

The saga of Air Canada pilots affected by that airline’s mandatory retirement policy achieved another milestone, recently.

The saga of Air Canada pilots affected by that airline’s mandatory retirement policy achieved another milestone, recently.

The result, for the moment, is that the mandatory retirement of that airline’s pilots, at age 60, has been upheld.

I first reviewed this case more than four years ago, as it began its snakes-and-ladders-like ride through the federal human rights process.

In 2007, all the news in the human resources sector was about the spreading abolition of mandatory retirement across this country.

While many provinces had announced, or implemented, legislation to end mandatory retirement, the federal jurisdiction had yet to follow suit.

And two Air Canada pilots had just lost their bid, pursuant to the Canadian Human Rights Act, to keep working past age 60.

The federal Act, while prohibiting discrimination based on age, continued to allow employers to impose mandatory retirement on an individual at the “normal age of retirement” for persons working in similar positions.

This allowed parties such as Air Canada and its pilots’ union to negotiate collective agreements which included a mandatory retirement provision.

In the Air Canada case, the evidence was that the union had previously agreed to retirement at age 60 for pilots in exchange for a rich compensation package which put the Air Canada pilots in an elite group of pensioners. Indeed, one of the two complainants was entitled to pension benefits of over $120,000 per year.

However, the two pilots, Vilven and Kelly, alleged that Air Canada discriminated against them on the basis of age by requiring them to retire at age 60.

Their union supported Air Canada’s opposition to these complaints.

Neither of the complainants was forced to stop working altogether—both found ongoing employment with other airlines.

The Canadian Human Rights Tribunal dismissed the complaints of discrimination.

It found that age 60 is the “normal” age of retirement, as defined in the Act, for pilots flying regularly scheduled international flights on wide-bodied aircraft with major international airlines.

Canada, in fact, had (in 2007, anyway) no maximum licensing age for airline pilots.

To be licensed, pilots have to successfully pass medical examinations approved by Transport Canada and, after the age of 40, the examination must be passed twice per year.

Canada is, however, subject to the standards and recommended practices developed by the International Civil Aviation Organization. The ICAO has standards and recommended practices for the maximum age of pilots flying commercial aircraft internationally.

At the time the pilots were forced to retire from Air Canada, the ICAO’s maximum recommended flying age was 60 (but it has since raised that standard to age 65).

The evidence considered by the tribunal revealed that, for 80 per cent of pilots flying regularly scheduled international flights on wide-bodied aircraft with major international airlines, age 60 was the normal retirement age.

This was sufficient for the tribunal to conclude that 60 is the “normal” retirement age in this context.

That was 2007. Since then, in more appeals and reconsiderations and rulings on this matter than the average person could hope to count, a number of significant developments have occurred.

In 2009, the Federal Court of Canada and the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal determined that the “normal age of retirement provision” contained in the Canadian Human Rights Act is unconstitutional.

So, regardless of what happens going forward, that protection of the practice of mandatory retirement seems to be a goner.

However, in its most recent ruling, the tribunal has determined that retirement at age 60 is a “bona fide occupational requirement” in the context of Air Canada’s operations because retaining the pilots beyond that age would constitute an undue hardship for the airline.

This means that the pilots are back where they started in 2007 in that Air Canada can still force them to retire when they turn 60.

In a broader sense, the era of mandatory retirement in the federal jurisdiction for employees who have reached “the normal age of retirement” for persons in similar employment has ended.

This represents one more nail in the coffin of the practice of mandatory retirement from employment.





Robert Smithson is a labour and employment lawyer, and operates Smithson Employment Law in Kelowna. This subject matter is provided for general informational purposes only and is not intended as legal advice.



Just Posted

Okanagan can learn from Washington’s wine industry growth

Winery owner cites importance of industry collaboration

Okanagan wineries shine in global chardonnay competition

Recognition for Kalala and Liquidity wineries at 2018 Chardonnay du Monde competition

Kelowna’s South Perimeter Road project to go ahead

Project to extend Gordon Drive doesn’t get enough signatures to keep it from moving ahead

Fleeing driver leaves behind severely damaged car

West Kelowna crash occurred at Highway 97 South junction

Dozens of impaired Kelowna drivers ticketed on St. Patrick’s Day

Kelowna RCMP stopped many vehicles for impaired driving during a one day blitz

Rainy week ahead for Okanagan and Shuswap

Environment Canada is forecast rain for the next three days, starting Tuesday afternoon

Attempted gun smuggler across the Osoyoos border sentenced

Alex Louie, who prefers the name Senk’lip, was sentenced to the mandatory minimum

Pro-Trump protest sign with F-word is OK, court rules

Judges say Ontario man can protest publicly, even using vulgar language

VIDEO: Police officer looking for distracted drivers gets hit by truck

Road safety investigator clipped by trailer while patrolling busy intersection

YVR wants you to help name three new puppies

Say hello to the Vancouver Airport’s new assistance pups

Search and rescue help injured sledders off Owlhead

Volunteer searchers also locate two hikers near Little Shuswap Lake

Suspect who attacked autistic man in Ontario could be from B.C.’s south coast: police

29-year-old man was sent to hospital with serious injuries

Privacy watchdog to explore Facebook leak

Canadian expert says his analytics company helped Trump campaign capitalize on private Facebook info

How to keep local news visible in your Facebook feed

Facebook has changed the news feed to emphasize personal connections. You might see less news.

Most Read