I recently challenged perceptions about rights of way between drivers and pedestrians at intersections. Most drivers seem clueless that pedestrians have the right of way at every corner, not just the ones with crosswalk markings. Conversely, most pedestrians seem clueless about their legal obligation to look out for their own safety, even in a clearly marked, flashing lights crosswalk. If you missed those columns, see them at kelownacapnews.com.
Another perception problem was handed to me in the last two weeks.
Consider this scenario: A 61-year-old cyclist riding against traffic on a sidewalk, at night, with no lights and no helmet. A 19-year-old woman is leaving the parking lot of the downtown Kelowna Boston Pizza, turning right. The bicycle passes in front of the car which hits the left side of the cycle and cyclist. The cyclist is taken away by ambulance.
I suspect that almost everyone reading this column is pointing their fingers squarely at the cyclist as being at fault in this scenario.
Look at all the laws the cyclist is breaking! Section 183(2)(a) of the Motor Vehicle Act prohibits riding on a sidewalk, s.183(6)(a-c) requires the use of lights at night, s.184(1) requires a helmet and s.183(1) imposes obligations of a vehicle on a cyclist, which includes riding with instead of against traffic.
What about if, instead of a cyclist, it was a pedestrian (perhaps a parent pushing a baby buggy), a jogger or rollerblader? None of those laws would have protected against the unfortunate coincidence of passing in front of a driveway access at that unfortunate moment when a vehicle was exiting.
What about the rules of the road that apply to the motorist?
Did you know that just like “every corner is a crosswalk”, “every sidewalk is a stop sign”?
Section 176(1) requires a driver in these circumstances to come to a complete stop ahead of the sidewalk and then yield the right of way to pedestrians.
Have you ever done that? Have you ever, when coming out of a parking lot, actually brought your vehicle to a complete stop before the nose of your vehicle got to the sidewalk?
If you saw a pedestrian coming, of course you would stop. I’m talking about when you’re approaching the street, usually with something blocking your vision down the sidewalk one way or the other.
If you are like most motorists, you roll across the sidewalk, looking to your left for oncoming traffic, until you have a clear view. It is at that point, your nose likely fully into or crossing the sidewalk, when you come to a stop.
I wonder how many tickets would be handed out if the RCMP had a blitz on this important road safety law and staked out at a popular grocery store parking lot.
If the motorist who hit the cyclist had stopped her vehicle ahead of the sidewalk and looked to her right to see if there were any pedestrians, as the law required, she would have seen the unhelmeted cyclist on this well-lit downtown Kelowna street and not run into him.
In my opinion, a court would likely assess this motorist at least 50 per cent at fault in this collision. E-mail me if you would like a copy of Bradley v. Bath, 2010 BCCA 10, a case of our Court of Appeal with a similar fact pattern.
Unfortunately, the cyclist suffered 100 per cent of the injuries.
I challenge the RCMP to blitz this important road safety issue. Imagine the tickets that would be issued if law enforcement was staked out for even an hour at any popular grocery store parking lot.
I challenge you to focus on this road safety point until you have changed your driving behaviour.