Hergott: Don’t blame judge for fatal accident ruling

The court said: “Simple carelessness, to which even the most prudent drivers may occasionally succumb, is generally not criminal.”

The acquittal on Wednesday of a distracted driver charged with two counts of dangerous driving causing death is hard to take for the families left to mourn the young couple who lost their lives.

The tragic event occurred near midnight on Oct. 19, 2010.

It took almost three years for the criminal charge against the distracted driver to make its way through the court system and result in the verdict this week.

The distracted driver testified in her own defence.

While doing so, she broke into tears as she apologized for the loss of life.

There was no disputing the fact that she was the one behind the wheel of the car that launched into flight after hitting a concrete median, smashing into the young people’s Suzuki Swift, ripping the roof off and killing the young occupants.

There was also no disputing the fact that the crash occurred because the distracted driver, travelling along the Lougheed Highway in Pitt Meadows, had pulled around traffic that had stopped at a red light at an intersection she was planning to pass through, and into a “right turn only” lane going highway speed.

The dispute was whether or not the distracted driver had committed the criminal offence known commonly as “dangerous driving causing death”, prohibited by section 249 of the Criminal Code.

A conviction would have resulted in consequences to the distracted driver and a sense of justice for those left behind.

The judge hearing the case reportedly believed that the distracted driver’s actions were careless, but not criminal, noting that in order for the distracted driver to be found guilty of the crimes there had to be a “marked departure” from accepted norms of driving behaviour.

The inattention shown by the offending nurse returning home late at night after an upsetting emergency room shift was not the “marked departure” that a criminal conviction requires.

The Criminal Code section was considered by Canada’s top court last year in a case called R v. Roy.

The court had this to say about the distinction between a “mere” departure from a standard of driving care and a “marked” departure:  “Simple carelessness, to which even the most prudent drivers may occasionally succumb, is generally not criminal.”

The court quoted with approval the following: “If every departure from the civil norm is to be criminalized, regardless of the degree, we risk casting the net too widely and branding as criminals persons who are in reality not morally blameworthy.”

Our top court, and the judge applying the law this past week, are correct.

If we branded as criminals those drivers who fail to direct their full attention to the important driving task at hand we would be casting the net too widely indeed.

We have developed a driving culture where inattentive driving is the norm, not the exception.

Apart from meeting the test of being a “marked” departure, inattentive driving is arguably not even a “mere” departure from the common standard of driving care.

I urge those loved ones left behind in the tragic aftermath of inattentive driving to direct your disappointment not to the courts who apply the law we task them to apply, but instead to our driving culture, and join in working to change the driving attitudes that make up that culture.

Let’s work together to eliminate inattentive driving to the point that such driving resulting in this kind of tragic and totally avoidable loss of life becomes a “marked departure” from normal driving behaviour.

 

Just Posted

Kangaroo Creek Farm hops into season

Lake Country’s popular tourist site has opened its doors for the season

Rain on the way for the Okanagan-Shuswap

Vernon’s dust warning is ongoing

Four people displaced by Taylor Road fire

The Kelowna Fire Department say no one was injured and the cause of the fire is not suspicious

Kelowna patios ready for spring

Check out some local patios that are coming out with the sun

Kelowna golf course ready and open for spring business

Two Eagles Golf Course opened Saturday, more to come

Sparks fly as SUV speeds down wrong side of Highway 1 trying to flee RCMP

Captured on video, the vehicle headed westbound against oncoming traffic before crashing

Kootnekoff: R v. Sidhu, was he asleep?

Driver in Humboldt crash wasn’t distracted at time of collision with bus,… Continue reading

Trudeau calls May 6 byelection for B.C. riding of Nanaimo-Ladysmith

The riding opened up when Sheila Malcolmson resigned in January

B.C. VIEWS: The hijacking of our education system gathers speed

Children taught to strike and shout fringe far-left demands

Judges on Twitter? Ethical guidance for those on the bench under review

Canadian judges involvement in community life are among issues under review

Calgary captain has 3 points as Flames torch Canucks 3-1

Giordano leads way as Alberta side cracks 100-point plateau

Okanagan woman launches sewing studio

“I know there’s a lot of people up and down the valley that would love to sew.”

1,300 cruise ship passengers rescued by helicopter amid storm off Norway’s coast

Rescue teams with helicopters and boats were sent to evacuate the cruise ship under extremely difficult circumstances

Letter: Stop raising the minimum wage

To the editor: The government is looking for ways to put more… Continue reading

Most Read