Hergott: Seniors get a break in personal injury claim lawsuits

Is it fair to compensate a senior less than 1/2 that for a 40-year-old because he will suffer chronic pain for less than 1/2 as long?

One key goal that we strive for in our legal system is consistency.

If two different judges are faced with similar facts, we expect that they will come to similar conclusions.

In the context of a personal injury claim, we expect that people suffering similar losses will receive similar financial compensation for those losses; one person suffering a certain degree of chronic pain should be compensated at a similar level as another person suffering a similar degree of chronic pain.

That sounds easy enough, but often what sounds easy in theory becomes very difficult in practice.

No two people’s life circumstances are ever identical, and therefore the impact of pain and other symptoms is never the identical.

Let’s say, for example, two people suffer very similar injuries and are left with very similar levels of chronic symptoms, one of the injured victims is 40 and the other is 70.

We’ll put them both in the same car, in the same crash

Both are pain free before the crash. Both develop lower back pain that becomes chronic.

Each will suffer that lower back pain for the rest of his or her life.

According to an Internet life expectancy calculator, the senior, if a man, has a life expectancy of another 17 years.

The 40-year-old will have a life expectancy of another 43 years.

Should the senior receive less compensation?

Is fair financial compensation for the senior less than one-half that for the 40-year-old because he will suffer chronic lower back pain for less than one-half as long?

On the face of it, the analysis seems to have some logical merit, but it smells to high heaven.

Our courts have struggled with exactly this scenario, multiple times.

Rather than arbitrarily discounting a senior’s entitlement to compensation, our courts have decided that a senior’s loss might even require greater compensation.

There is a passage from a 1967 court judgment that is often quoted by justices of our courts when considering how to compensate those of advancing years.

The judge’s view was expressed as follows: “I take the view myself that when one has a person in advancing years, in some respects an impairment of movement may perhaps be more serious than it is with a younger person.”

After acknowledging the argument of the defence, that compensation should be lower, the judge continued as follows: “…it is important to bear in mind that as one advances in life, one’s pleasures and activities particularly do become more limited, and any substantial impairment in the limited amounts of activity and movement which a person can undertake, in my view, becomes all the more serious on that account.”

Seniors do experience discrimination as a result of their advanced age in our world, but I am pleased to report that such discrimination does not extend to our courts of law.

Just Posted

Black Mountain / sntsk‘il’ntən Regional Park starts to take shape

Student volunteers from three local schools work on trail building project

Kelowna’s Pleasure Painters to host day of art

The annual art sale will take place Oct. 20

Fire ignites at Kelowna homeless camp

No one was hurt in the incident, RCMP are investigating the cause of the fire

UPDATE: Kelowna mayoral candidates talk about crime

Candidates talk about an issue on many city residents’ minds—how to deal with crime downtown

Film exposing effects of Canadian mining company to be shown in Kelowna

Hudbay Minerals’ legacy of lead poisoning, and civil-suits including allegations of murder, rape and shootings

Store recognized for inclusive employment efforts

Shoppers Drug Mart in Summerland presented with certificate from WorkBC

Nanaimo’s Tilray pot stock continues rising, firm now worth more than $21 billion US

The B.C. company’s shares have risen more than 1,000 % since its initial public offering in July

Fresh-faced Flames fend off Canucks 4-1

Vancouver drops second straight NHL exhibition contest

VIDEO: B.C. deer struggles with life-preserver caught in antlers

Campbell River resident captures entangled deer on camera

Scheer pushes Trudeau to re-start Energy East pipeline talks

Conservative Leader Andrew Scheer questioned the Prime Minister over Trans Mountain project

Mistaken identity: Missing dog claimed in Moose Jaw belongs to another family

Brennen Duncan was reunited with a white Kuvasz that was found in Saskatchewan

Abandoned kitten safe and sound thanks to B.C. homeless man

‘Jay’ found little black-and-white kitten in a carrier next to a dumpster by a Chilliwack pet store

Police chief defends controversial marijuana seizure

Advocates said cannabis was part of an opioid-substitution program in Vancouver’s Downtown Eastside

Trans Mountain completes Burrard Inlet spill exercise

Training required, some work continues on pipeline expansion

Most Read