Hergott: Show a little common sense when venturing out on slippery sidewalks

At this time of year common sense, as well as proper foot ware, is required when out and about.

I never get sick. I’ve said those words as recently as last week.

But I should have knocked on wood, because here I am with a sore and scratchy throat, feeling like hell.

It takes something away from the milestone experience of meeting the deadline for my 6th anniversary column.

That’s a lot of deadlines. My first weekly column was published in the Westside section of the Capital News on Jan.7, 2007, so I’ve met over 305 deadlines over that time.

For many of those deadlines, I’ve puzzled much of the late evening to come up with a topic, laptop in bed, my wife kindly wearing wireless television headphones so I’m not bothered by whatever program she’s watching.

I don’t have that problem this time. The topic of taking legal responsibility for sidewalk safety has become a “hat trick” with this third column on the subject.

There’s another reader to thank, coincidentally another lady named Carol. This latest Carol responded to my position that those required by law to keep sidewalks safe should take the responsibility for doing so or face the legal consequences.

She took the opposite position. She raised the responsibility of pedestrians, writing: “The problem is not the snow ploughs or the residents who can’t keep up. The problem is with the idiots who don’t stay at home in the first place and if they insist or have to walk, and slip and fall, get up and shut up. Being able to sue the homeowner is the usual, not taking responsibility for our own actions.”

However unhelpfully inflammatory her language, and extreme her position, there’s a valid point between the lines of her e-mail.

The law does, in fact, place a duty on pedestrians to take reasonable care for their own safety.

Not every slip and fall injury results in a valid compensation claim.

There is always a careful analysis of the competing duties involved.

On one hand, there is the duty on the property owner to keep premises safe. On the other, there is the duty on the pedestrian to take reasonable care for his or her own safety.

Sometimes, when assessing the competing duties, the balance falls heavily against the pedestrian.

It would be a rare set of circumstances, indeed, but not impossible to conceive of, when the law would require a pedestrian to “stay at home” to meet the duty to look after his or her own safety.

I am thinking about a freezing rain storm that leaves all sidewalk surfaces sheets of ice.

The law might find it unreasonable for a pedestrian to venture out at all until property owners had a reasonable opportunity to eliminate the hazard.

A more typical scenario where a pedestrian might share liability would be an obvious hazard that could have been easily avoided had the pedestrian simply paid attention to the sidewalk ahead of him.

Consider a readily apparent mound of ice that a pedestrian, taking reasonable care, could have avoided simply by side-stepping it.

The failure to side-step the hazard, resulting in a serious injury, could lead a court to attach some percentage of the blame to the pedestrian.

Wearing footwear that is unsuitable to a winter climate might also result in a pedestrian sharing liability.

Santa Claus solved that problem for my father by leaving ice-grabbing grips that attach to the bottom of his shoes in his Christmas stocking.

If you go out for a winter stroll wearing slick bottom shoes you are just asking for trouble.

I think I may have now milked the sidewalk safety cow quite enough with this trilogy of columns. Don’t hesitate to send me more questions on the subject, though, perhaps we can stretch it to a fourth.

If you feel compelled to come by my office to wish me a “happy sixth anniversary,” please do so, and I will give you a “One Crash is Too Many” key chain.

I look forward to another year of sharing legal ideas and doing what I can to change driving attitudes and behaviours through the Capital News.

This column is intended to provide general information about injury claims. Paul Hergott is a lawyer at Hergott Law in West Kelowna.

 

 

Just Posted

Jumper cables ignite small car fire

Fire crews quickly put out a car fire in Rutland Wednesday afternoon

Central Okanagan residents urged to chip it, not chuck it

Plans already in place to dispose of Christmas trees after the upcoming holiday

Outbreak affects eight people in Vernon

UPDATE: Gastrointestinal illness reported at Vernon Jubilee Hospital

Ice fishing returns to Lake Country

The annual Learn to Ice Fish event takes place at Beaver Lake

Me Too At Work: Sexual assault and harassment in the B.C. workplace

Introducing an in-depth look at who is affected and what can be done

Bomb detonated in Kamloops neighbourhood

Kamloops RCMP are investigating after an improvised explosive device was detonated Wednesday morning

No More Shootouts: Strong defence will be Canada’s backbone at world juniors

Head coach doesn’t want a situation where a hot goalie or a lucky bounce can determine a team’s fate

Big White fire department given seasons passes

Members of the Work Experience Program were given passes by the resort

‘Assemble your own meal’ kits grow into $120M industry in Canada

Kits offer a middle ground between eating out and grocery shopping

Millennials closing in as B.C.’s biggest wine drinkers

Generation X leads the way in current consumption of B.C. wine, as more wine drinkers are enjoying local varietals

Canadians lag behind Americans in giving to charity

Only one-in-five Canadians donated to charities in 2017

B.C. children adoption rates lagging, despite increased funding: watchdog

More than 1,000 children are still waiting to be adopted, new report shows

Hurdles ahead for Sicamous off-road vehicle bylaw

RCMP, ICBC and province not yet on-board with district

Most Read