Letter: B.C. dog laws have to be challenged in court

B.C.'s Community Charter, Section 49 "Special Powers in Relation to Dangerous Dogs" gives such absolute power to animal control authorities.

I am aware of two pieces of British Columbia legislation that need to be examined by the Supreme Court of Canada.  Both B.C. laws, in my opinion, need changes to conform with the Constitution’s Charter of Rights, something both B.C. laws have not properly considered, in my opinion.

This month (April 2014), David Lloydsmith’s six-year-long struggle to keep his Fraser Valley home from being seized ended when the B.C, Civil Forfeiture Office dropped its case against him. They had no case.

Another British Columbia man was less fortunate.  David Smith of Peachland had his property seized by the Regional District of Central Okanagan in March 2011.  Mr. Smith’s property was a large friendly coon-hound looking dog named Diesel. The RDCO defined Diesel as dangerous, based on the belief of one person, an animal control officer.

B.C.’s Community Charter, Section 49 “Special Powers in Relation to Dangerous Dogs” gives such absolute power to animal control authorities. Mr. Smith fought to save Diesel’s life all the way to the B.C. Supreme Court, but he failed to get his property returned. Indeed, he may even have failed to save his dog’s life, whose end is unkown to this day. More than two years after being confined in a Kelowna pound, Diesel’s fate was deciced by a B.C. Supreme Court Justice.  He ruled that Diesel be given to the RDCO dog control authorities, surely mindful of the fact that RDCO had sought the dog’s death in both the provincial trial and his B.,C. Supreme Courtroom. Diesel was to be placed in the care of an anonymous dog rescue society, chosen by the RDCO, for an eventual anonymous home.  How ominous.

Publicly the RDCO Dog Control representative stated that euthanasia (a good death) was off the table. Good or sad outcomes, neither man should have been made to endure years of suffering based on questionable evidence.  These laws have to be challenged in the Supreme Court of Canada.

Helen Schiele,

Kelowna

 

Just Posted

Imagine Kelowna’s future this week

Four community meetings will take place on the future of the city

Accidents mount as snow falls

Kelowna drivers are having a tough time with worsening conditions

Kelowna’s global awareness festival set to go

Festival organizers get $22,800 grant from federal government to help stage this year’s events

Bus slams into truck at Kelowna intersection

A transit bus and a pick-up truck came together in the noon hour in Kelowna

Downtown Kelowna shopping mall getting face lift

The Towne Centre Mall on Bernard will be renamed and renovated inside and out

Scandia Jungle mini golf course reopening

Kelowna - Rutland Elementary students were the first ones to try the revamped course Tuesday

Castlegar homicide victim identified

The victim was 38-year-old Jordan Workman of Castlegar, B.C.

B.C. Liberal leadership candidates get one last prime-time pitch

Leadership campaign to be decided in Feb. 3 vote

Letter: Dictatorships don’t happen by accident

Kelowna letter-writer says people following Donald Trump are enabling him

Team chaplain reflects on time with Silverbacks

Kenny Toews served as a mentor and spiritual leader to the team for six seasons

Drawings connect autistic student with the world

Leifen Mitchell-Banks creates colourful cartoon characters at Salmon Arm Secondary.

Lake Country skier named Olympic alternate

Ian Deans will be a back up for the men’s ski cross team in South Korea

Andrew Scheer on trade, Trump and Trudeau

Canada’s Conservative leader begins three-day visit to B.C.

10 Safeways in Lower Mainland to close, union says

Locations in Vancouver, Burnaby, Surrey, Coquitlam, Richmond and Mission slated to shut

Most Read