Susan Kootnekoff is the founder of Inspire Law, an Okanagan based-law practice. She has been practicing law since 1994, with brief stints away to begin raising children. Susan has experience in many areas of law, but is most drawn to areas in which she can make a positive difference in people’s lives, including employment law. She has been a member of the Law Society of Alberta since 1994 and a member of the Law Society of British Columbia since 2015. Susan grew up in Saskatchewan. Her parents were both entrepreneurs, and her father was also a union leader who worked tirelessly to improve the lives of workers. Before moving to B.C., Susan practiced law in both Calgary and Fort McMurray, AB. Living and practicing law in Fort McMurray made a lasting impression on Susan. It was in this isolated and unique community that her interest in employment law, and Canada’s oil sands industry, took hold. In 2013, Susan moved to the Okanagan with her family, where she currently resides. Photo: Contributed

Kootnekoff: Insurer pays after egregious breach of good faith, denial of LTD benefits

A B.C. Supreme Court rules against another long term disability provider

In Greig v Desjardins Financial Security Life Assurance Company, the British Columbia Supreme Court recently chastised another long term disability (LTD) provider for wrongfully denying benefits to an injured employee.

Mr. Greig was employed by a B.C. school district and was represented by CUPE Local 382. He was covered by a collective agreement which provided for LTD coverage.

In January, 2014, Mr. Greig became injured. He was unable to return to work. He submitted an LTD claim to the insurer, Desjardins Financial Security Life Assurance Company. It accepted it.

He attended a work hardening program, but struggled. In October, 2014, the program provider issued a discharge report that suggested a graduated return to work, pain strategies and an exercise program.

In April, 2015, Desjardins terminated his coverage. It stated that it was awaiting a medical report from Mr. Greig. Upon receiving it, it would “review” his claim for further benefits.

The parties resolved the issue of his compensation entitlement under the Plan.

The issue before the court was whether, in addition to his benefits, Mr. Greig was entitled to additional damages for financial loss and mental distress as a result of the insurer’s mishandling of his claim.

The insurer had required Mr. Greig to provide objective proof of disability. This was not required by the Plan text.

Once Mr. Greig commenced litigation, Desjardins focused on defending itself in the litigation. It ignored the claim and abandoned any meaningful adjudication of it. The termination of Mr. Greig’s benefits catastrophically changed his and his wife’s financial situation. They could not pay their debts. The couple separated for a period of time.

The Court stated that:

  • The contract of insurance between an insurer and its insured is one of utmost good faith. In every insurance contract, an insurer has an implied obligation to deal with claims by its insureds in good faith.
  • The duty of good faith also requires an insurer to deal with its insured’s claim fairly. The duty to act fairly applies both to the manner in which the insurer investigates and assesses the claim and to the decision whether or not to pay the claim…. an insurer must assess the merits of the claim in a balanced and reasonable manner. It must not deny coverage or delay payment in order to take advantage of the insured’s economic vulnerability or to gain bargaining leverage in negotiating a settlement.
  • The Court considered another case, Godwin v. Desjardins Financial Security Investments Inc. In that case, Desjardins failed to assess the claim in a fair and balanced manner. It repeatedly failed to analyze and weigh the evidence, applied tests for disability beyond those set out in the policy, and made findings that were not supported by the evidence. The court concluded that Desjardins breached its duty of good faith. Punitive damages, and special costs, were awarded.

Yet, in Mr. Greig’s case, the same insurer repeated this conduct.

Upon termination of Mr. Greig’s benefits, Desjardins had overwhelming evidence of mental issues. It failed to take any steps to acknowledge, support, or investigate these issues until late 2016. The insurer also improperly relied on the work hardening discharge report, even though no physician ever endorsed that plan.

Mr. Greig’s counsel’s requests, and letters providing additional medical information, went unanswered.

The court held that Desjardins’ failure to investigate the obvious mental health aspects of the plaintiff’s disability was an egregious breach of the duty of good faith it owed to Mr. Greig.

In the end, the court awarded Mr. Greig $50,000 in aggravated damages and another $200,000 in punitive damages.

The court is sending a strong message to insurers who fail to deal fairly and in good faith with injured people.

If you feel an insurer is mishandling your claim in this manner, be aware that this is not acceptable. Insurers have certain legal obligations, and insureds have certain rights.

The content of this article is intended to provide very general thoughts and general information, not to provide legal advice. Specialist advice from a qualified legal professional should be sought about your specific circumstances.

If you would like to reach us, we may be reached through our website, at www.inspirelaw.ca.

To report a typo, email:
newstips@kelownacapnews.com
.


@KelownaCapNews
newstips@kelownacapnews.com

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Get local stories you won't find anywhere else right to your inbox.
Sign up here

Just Posted

South Okanagan mayors put their BCHL jerseys on the line

Mayors of Penticton and West Kelowna make a “friendly” wager on the BCHL series outcome.

Central Okanagan school board members approve $50,000 loan for KLO modular farm

The garden will grow lettuce, kale and other vegetables once completed

Guilty plea withdrawn in West Kelowna murder trial

Tejwant Danjou’s application to have his impromptu guilty plea removed was accepted by the court

UBCO researchers create technology to help protect grapes from wildfire smoke

Spray could potentially be applied on farms across the Okanagan

Peachland to host International Women’s Day Celebration

The day will honour Okanagan women’s contributions to the land, water and their communities

Cheslatta Carrier Nation and Rio Tinto sign a historic agreement

Co-operation crucial to stem dropping Nechako Reservoir level

Vernon dust factor nearly five times that of Kelowna

Road grit a factor in uptick of advisories

Study continues on Summerland’s perpetual slide

Slide in Paradise Flats area has affected Trout Creek for more than 100 years

Hundreds of B.C. firefighters ‘climb the wall’ for BC Lung Association

The charity fundraiser saw participants climbing up 48 storeys

Salmon Arm RCMP, new immigrants get acquainted at police station

Tour of detachment provides opportunity to explore differences in judicial systems

Stories of sexual assault at B.C. tree planting camps ‘shocking but not surprising:’ advocate

Contractors’ association is working with trainers to create respectful culture

New York performer can’t wait to bring Chicago to the South Okanagan

The timeless, award-winning musical comes to the South Okanagan Events Centre March 28.

Lawyer gets house arrest for possessing child porn

Maple Ridge resident gets nine-month term

Most Read